The official discord link if you wish to join the discord: https://discord.gg/j5RKwCvAFu

Support the wiki on our official Ko-Fi page or Patreon page!

Omniscience: Difference between revisions

From The Codex
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:One-Above-All.jpg|thumb|356x356px]]
[[File:One-Above-All.jpg|center|600px]]


==Background==
==Background==
'''Omniscience''' is the state of knowing everything or, in other words, of knowing everything. An omniscient character knows everything his opponent will do before doing it and knows exactly what to do to win a fight. An omniscient character is always able to be mastered and lose, however. In addition, knowledge of other fiction is not a requirement of omniscience. A character who knows everything about his own fictional franchise is therefore considered omniscient.  
'''Omniscience''' is the ability to possess absolute knowledge of everything, whether in the form of physical events, abstract concepts, potentialities, or alternate realities. Such knowledge grants the user unparalleled insight, allowing them to anticipate every action, consequence, and possibility. Omniscience is often portrayed as a divine or transcendent quality, central to entities that embody ultimate wisdom or cosmic authority. 
 
Philosophically, omniscience raises profound questions about free will, determinism, and the limits of knowledge itself. While omniscience often conveys invulnerability in terms of intelligence or awareness, it is not synonymous with omnipotence or invincibility, as knowledge alone does not inherently grant the ability to act on that knowledge without other forms of power.
 
==Philosophical Considerations== 
Omniscience introduces a range of philosophical debates, primarily focused on the nature and implications of infinite knowledge: 
 
* '''Determinism and Free Will:''' If an omniscient entity knows all future events, it suggests a deterministic universe where free will is an illusion. However, some interpretations of omniscience suggest the being knows every possible outcome rather than one inevitable future, allowing for free will within a probabilistic framework. 
 
* '''Practicality of Infinite Knowledge:''' Possessing infinite knowledge can lead to the paradox of inaction. If an omniscient being knows the consequences of every action, does it make them incapable of choice? Philosophers often debate whether infinite knowledge inherently limits or enhances freedom of action. 
 
* '''Omniscience and Self-Knowledge:'''  True omniscience includes knowledge of oneself, creating a potentially infinite loop of self-awareness. This raises the question of whether omniscience can lead to self-paralysis or enlightenment. 
 
* '''Omniscience vs. Omnipotence:'''  Knowing everything does not necessarily mean the ability to act on that knowledge. For instance, an omniscient character may understand how to solve a conflict but lack the means to do so. 
 
* '''Moral and Ethical Implications:'''  If a being knows every possible consequence of their actions, they may face the ultimate moral dilemma—whether to intervene in events or allow free will and natural outcomes to prevail.
 
==Possible Applications== 
* '''Strategic Foresight:''' Knowing every move an opponent will make before they do, enabling perfect counter-strategies. 
* '''Absolute Awareness:''' Understanding every event, thought, and phenomenon across the multiverse simultaneously. 
* '''Truth Identification:''' Recognizing lies, deceptions, or hidden truths instantly. 
* '''Knowledge of Alternate Realities:''' Understanding the intricacies of all possible worlds and timelines. 
* '''Meta-Awareness:''' Knowing the mechanics of one’s reality or even the narrative structures of fiction. 
* '''Conflict Resolution:''' Resolving any situation through perfect knowledge of outcomes and consequences. 
* '''Omni-Learning:''' Instantly mastering any subject, skill, or ability through direct comprehension. 
 
==Limitations== 
* '''Action vs. Knowledge Dichotomy:''' Knowing everything does not guarantee the power or freedom to act. 
* '''Narrative Imbalance:''' Writers often impose restrictions to avoid undermining storytelling tension. For instance, omniscience may be constrained by emotional factors or limited access to specific planes of existence.
 
===Classification for Profiles===
To classify omniscience in a profile, the following criteria must be met:
#'''Comprehensive Scope:''' The character must demonstrate knowledge across all domains—physical, metaphysical, abstract, and narrative. 
#'''Explicit Demonstration:''' The profile should include clear examples of the character applying their omniscience, such as anticipating outcomes, unraveling hidden truths, or understanding abstract concepts effortlessly.
#'''Meta-Omniscience:''' For characters aware of their fictional nature or other fictional universes, this should be explicitly stated as a unique extension of omniscience. Though this is not directly retired.
#'''Philosophical Justification:''' Consider whether the character’s omniscience aligns with their narrative role and the philosophical ideas underpinning the concept.


==Users==
==Users==
*[[Golden Goddesses]] [[The Legend of Zelda|(The Legend of Zelda)]]
*[[Tomska]] (Tomska)
*[[Tomska]] (Tomska)
[[Category:Powers and Abilities]]
[[Category:Powers and Abilities]]
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Terms]]
{{Discussions}}

Latest revision as of 13:13, 21 November 2024

Background

Omniscience is the ability to possess absolute knowledge of everything, whether in the form of physical events, abstract concepts, potentialities, or alternate realities. Such knowledge grants the user unparalleled insight, allowing them to anticipate every action, consequence, and possibility. Omniscience is often portrayed as a divine or transcendent quality, central to entities that embody ultimate wisdom or cosmic authority.

Philosophically, omniscience raises profound questions about free will, determinism, and the limits of knowledge itself. While omniscience often conveys invulnerability in terms of intelligence or awareness, it is not synonymous with omnipotence or invincibility, as knowledge alone does not inherently grant the ability to act on that knowledge without other forms of power.

Philosophical Considerations

Omniscience introduces a range of philosophical debates, primarily focused on the nature and implications of infinite knowledge:

  • Determinism and Free Will: If an omniscient entity knows all future events, it suggests a deterministic universe where free will is an illusion. However, some interpretations of omniscience suggest the being knows every possible outcome rather than one inevitable future, allowing for free will within a probabilistic framework.
  • Practicality of Infinite Knowledge: Possessing infinite knowledge can lead to the paradox of inaction. If an omniscient being knows the consequences of every action, does it make them incapable of choice? Philosophers often debate whether infinite knowledge inherently limits or enhances freedom of action.
  • Omniscience and Self-Knowledge: True omniscience includes knowledge of oneself, creating a potentially infinite loop of self-awareness. This raises the question of whether omniscience can lead to self-paralysis or enlightenment.
  • Omniscience vs. Omnipotence: Knowing everything does not necessarily mean the ability to act on that knowledge. For instance, an omniscient character may understand how to solve a conflict but lack the means to do so.
  • Moral and Ethical Implications: If a being knows every possible consequence of their actions, they may face the ultimate moral dilemma—whether to intervene in events or allow free will and natural outcomes to prevail.

Possible Applications

  • Strategic Foresight: Knowing every move an opponent will make before they do, enabling perfect counter-strategies.
  • Absolute Awareness: Understanding every event, thought, and phenomenon across the multiverse simultaneously.
  • Truth Identification: Recognizing lies, deceptions, or hidden truths instantly.
  • Knowledge of Alternate Realities: Understanding the intricacies of all possible worlds and timelines.
  • Meta-Awareness: Knowing the mechanics of one’s reality or even the narrative structures of fiction.
  • Conflict Resolution: Resolving any situation through perfect knowledge of outcomes and consequences.
  • Omni-Learning: Instantly mastering any subject, skill, or ability through direct comprehension.

Limitations

  • Action vs. Knowledge Dichotomy: Knowing everything does not guarantee the power or freedom to act.
  • Narrative Imbalance: Writers often impose restrictions to avoid undermining storytelling tension. For instance, omniscience may be constrained by emotional factors or limited access to specific planes of existence.

Classification for Profiles

To classify omniscience in a profile, the following criteria must be met:

  1. Comprehensive Scope: The character must demonstrate knowledge across all domains—physical, metaphysical, abstract, and narrative.
  2. Explicit Demonstration: The profile should include clear examples of the character applying their omniscience, such as anticipating outcomes, unraveling hidden truths, or understanding abstract concepts effortlessly.
  3. Meta-Omniscience: For characters aware of their fictional nature or other fictional universes, this should be explicitly stated as a unique extension of omniscience. Though this is not directly retired.
  4. Philosophical Justification: Consider whether the character’s omniscience aligns with their narrative role and the philosophical ideas underpinning the concept.

Users